Yes folks it is yet another example of health and safety gone fucking mental. The latest danger is, we are told, trees. That’s right those things which cover around 12% of the whole country which you may think are just standing there harmlessly enriching the landscape. Au contraire, they are a menace and one could fall on you any minute. Just think of the deceased people you have known who would be here today had a tree or branch not hit them. Not one? – me neither.
BSI British Standards, an official setter of benchmarks, is drafting guidelines on safety inspections for trees that hilight the hidden dangers of “branch shedding” (falling branches, to the layman) and even “whole-tree failure” that they pose. It suggests they should all be scrutinised once a year by their owners. Trained inspectors should beat them with mallets and prod them with probes every two years or so and still more expert folk assess the risk they pose to ambling, snoozing or tree-hugging passers-by every five years.

The hidden killer menace we need protected from by law (aka a tree)
Sir Harry Studholme of the Forestry Commission frets that the tiny risk of harm trees pose are not being properly weighed against their many benefits, not least in ameliorating climate change. Landowners, local councils and ordinary folk with back gardens may choose to chop down their trees rather than pay for onerous regular inspections, he says. This would exacerbate an existing trend: some public bodies are already cutting down trees rather than risk getting sued if one causes harm. Exeter Cathedral last year removed a beautiful old stand of healthy trees on its green after they were declared to be of a dangerous variety.
Rick Haythornthwaite, the chairman of the Risk and Regulation Advisory Council, which gives independent guidance to the government, reckons the attempt to over-regulate trees reveals two trends. The first is the tendency for small risks to become magnified in the public mind and provoke disproportionate responses. The second is the growing involvement of special-interest groups in campaigning for tougher regulation. It is surely no coincidence, he points out, that among the most active proponents of the new standard are the tree professionals who stand to gain most from a more burdensome inspection regime.
The Economist Article
Times Online
Filed under: Health and Safety Gone Mad | Tagged: Rant, trees | 8 Comments »